Whippled DA Engine Makes 851 hp/870 torque at the wheels on 91 octane/17 lb boost


Status
Not open for further replies.

nota4re

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Feb 15, 2006
4,294
B.M.F. and Apollo - thanks for your comments. You know that I'm not really trying to create sides - despite that everyone is quick to go on the attack.

As I said before. I wanna believe. Tell me more. It goes against my "small minded" expectations on what is possible.... Didn't I say I'm ready to eat crow? Perhaps a small price for the knowledge I can gain!
 

B.M.F.

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Jan 29, 2009
1,814
Minnesota
Superflow dynos are called lie detectors for a reason. They expose the lies told by dynojets...

Does superflow even have a big roller dyno that will hold more than 250rwhp with out 500lbs of sand in the car or 3 fat guys? LOL My local guy has a twin roller superflow. I can't even dyno my mom's mustang on it with out spinning the tires. Those twin 12'' rollers are downright GAY........ I would say all the top tuners in the country use dyno jet. hennessy, heffner, ugr, Spetter, and i could go on for hours as i know alot of people including diablo and sct tuning. I don't know anyone that has a superflow that likes it and my engine builder always bitches about their customer service when they don't work. but that's your opinion.....
 

Luke Warmwater

Permanent Vacation
Jul 29, 2009
1,414
Boondocks, Colorado
Have no idea what you are talking about. I have been at several diesel dyno competitions with my truck and others putting down from 600 to well over 1000hp and 1200 to 2000 lbft of torque on a superflow. They can simulate a true load and put a hurt on the vehicle in a way no dynojets could ever do. Dyno arguments are fun. That said, unrealistic CFs can significantly distort results for forced induction vehicles. The only true way to compare output us same dyno same day even same time of day. Results are all relative in dyno land.
 

BlackICE

GT Owner
Nov 2, 2005
1,416
SF Bay Area in California
Someone needs to learn to read, I said it sounds sinister. This does not mean I concuded it is more powerful.. We all know sound has nothing to do with power. I have a louder exhaust and I have not concluded I have added more power because it is louder .. I'll run any of you guys to 100 mph with my pulley tune car and you maybe surprised.. :biggrin
Why are none of your Tuned Turbo guys bringing thier cars to the rally ??? :confused

I can attest to the power of those pulley and tune cars. They may dyno lower, but Stormcat kill me in the mile and Piana smoked me in the 1/4, both have just a pulley and tune.
 

Mullet

FORD GT OWNER
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Oct 21, 2008
2,468
Houston Texas
Have no idea what you are talking about. I have been at several diesel dyno competitions with my truck and others putting down from 600 to well over 1000hp and 1200 to 2000 lbft of torque on a superflow. They can simulate a true load and put a hurt on the vehicle in a way no dynojets could ever do. Dyno arguments are fun. That said, unrealistic CFs can significantly distort results for forced induction vehicles. The only true way to compare output us same dyno same day even same time of day. Results are all relative in dyno land.
One step further......I'd rather line up 2 cars on the freeway, honk 3 times and whoever lifts first loses. Also a mile pull on a runway and let the end speed do the talking. :)
 

BlackICE

GT Owner
Nov 2, 2005
1,416
SF Bay Area in California
Damn!
I've been wasting my time watching the stock market for my weekly dose of up and down out of control wackiness.

Reading this thread may be more fun than watching C-SPAN. :lol
 
Aug 25, 2006
4,436
NO prob, but you have not answered a single ? I have asked.


What type of dyno were you dynoing it on?? Stock air box or NO? What a/f were ya running? Stock Injectors? Boost a pump in it? I think I read where Kendall said it knocked a catylatic converter out of it. I take it your runnning it in the 10's for air fuel with that much compresion and yes the cats will not live long like that. This car probably would not be safe with a texas mile style pull with this much power and stock fuel system. Do you agree? These are great numbers no doubt but fill us in on the rest of the info.

I also see where Kendall is coming from, when Ed posted these numbers, there was no description to as what was done to the motor, besides you chiming in and saying the Gal had been massaged. (Btw gal and these cars really don't fit well together) Just saying. So this leads the undeducated people to believe there is Magic Vodoo going on @ da. When all the power really came from more compression, cams and some head work along with a fatter a/f so it lives on pump gas and pulling a few degrees of timing. Not everyone has paid attention to Ed's earlier build thread, nor was the compression even talked about that I can remember in it. I think Kendall is just trying to make everyone on the same page. As for those who are not in the KNOW on what the internal work will do to increase power, will think that da is a super hero for making that power with that low of boost when that is not the case. The internal engine mods are 95% of the reason for the increase which you did have a part in as you built it.

Like i said early, Dynojet in my mind is the industry standard in hp figures. Mustang dyno, superflow, and all the other ones out there are usually off in numbers compared to dynojet's. You can dyno on a 224 dyno jet and travel across town and dyno on a 248 dyno jet and they with be within a few numbers. Heffner uses dynojet, torrie uses dyno jet. I believe that Soroush's guys use dyno jet, hennessy has dynojet, Kumar's guy has dyno jet. I have a dyno jet. By your dyno graph it looks as you are using something different so WHAT IS IT?

Ed's gal has been on a Dyna Pak, SuperFlow, Dyna Jet, and this latest session was on a Dyno Com. I too like the Dyna Pak and when using others I make like an onion skin and overlay them and for my sake “only” and I see an average; remember I shared I do "not" solicited dyno charts as anything more than interesting because it is only “one” (IMO small) portion of the tuning process and yet in this case Ed presented it because he had been called into question in an earlier thread and he was excited. I had no intention of participating in the thread and yet when some of the comments were made and Ed was unable to reply I felt that I had to. As for what dynos others use; I can only share that Torrie typically uses a Dyna Jet and not a Dyna Pak.

The air box is as OEM

The injectors are OEM as is the entire fuel system at this time and it is because of this that she is "not" prepared to run a mile event at this power level because she would run out of fuel; I already stated this. In fact at the last mile event such happened as documented by our data log which is what took out the cats; they were melted. FYI she no longer has cats.

The fuel requirements for gear blasts, road course activities, drag racing, and the mile are all very different but then you already are fully aware of this.

As for filling in all of the blanks; I have shared openly and will answer questions however I am not going to draft and post a build sheet; this has been a work in progress with her now having a Bryant crank, JE 10.1 flat top pistons with the tops ceramic coated and the skirts Teflon coated, Total Seal stainless rings, a different and stronger set of Manley rods, custom cams, custom cam chains as stated along with custom tensioners and “yes” the primary chain is OEM as there are no custom chains available and this one and yet it has not proven to be an issue. There was much massaging throughout as this project has progressed over time and yet I need to make clear again; hardware and internal massaging alone will not create these results. Having shared this I remain certain that this is not the end of the road for Ed and his gal but rather one more stop along the way as it has been a long journey and we expect it to continue.

Once can compile the create array of hardware and in the end have little more than a wonderful array of hardware, one can massage and massage only to find that which is being done to be counterproductive, and then there is the tuning; “NOT” on the dyno playing the let’s get a number game but rather that which it take to create a machine that is usable in the real world and not simply WOT.

When drag racing on an extreme level at the tree would be two gals often with hearts nearly the same based on the hardware build sheets and yet one was a rocket and one a bomb. It is more often the incremental differences that would set one successfully apart from the bomb and furthermore experience and the willingness to step out of the proverbial box which means taking risks is a key component.

If it was easy and inexpensive everyone would consider it however it is not but then you know this as well too.

Other forum members such as Fubar, Mullet, Soroush, Torrie, have all stepped out of the proverbial box with at time great success and at other times something less and yet through it all there has always been a supportive audience that was able to vicariously participate in their project and in many cases learn something however for whatever reason this thread took on a different tone. I suspect that the only reason that Ed is having a hard time with this thread is because it is associated with the “Shadowman”

The thread was a simple sharing of Ed’s present dyno sheet and it was never intended on being a classroom and yet “all” of you know that I am only a phone call away.

Thank you all for the time spent reading the thread and your participation within it.

Takes care

Shadowman
 
Last edited:
Aug 25, 2006
4,436
One step further......I'd rather line up 2 cars on the freeway, honk 3 times and whoever lifts first loses. Also a mile pull on a runway and let the end speed do the talking. :)

I agree as this act makes clear that what is on paper is worth little more than the paper it was printed on; as shared earlier when racing the paper means NADA as it is the first gal to the finish line that counts.

Thank you

Shadowman
 

sandman

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Jul 10, 2006
465
Gardnerville, Nv.
Ed's gal has been on a Dyna Pak, SuperFlow, Dyna Jet, and this latest session was on a Dyno Com. I too like the Dyna Pak and when using others I make like an onion skin and overlay them and for my sake “only” and I see an average; remember I shared I do "not" solicited dyno charts as anything more than interesting because it is only “one” (IMO small) portion of the tuning process and yet in this case Ed presented it because he had been called into question in an earlier thread and he was excited. I had no intention of participating in the thread and yet when some of the comments were made and Ed was unable to reply I felt that I had to. As for what dynos others use; I can only share that Torrie typically uses a Dyna Jet and not a Dyna Pak.

The air box is as OEM

The injectors are OEM as is the entire fuel system at this time and it is because of this that she is "not" prepared to run a mile event at this power level because she would run out of fuel; I already stated this. In fact at the last mile event such happened as documented by our data log which is what took out the cats; they were melted. FYI she no longer has cats.

The fuel requirements for gear blasts, road course activities, drag racing, and the mile are all very different but then you already are fully aware of this.

As for filling in all of the blanks; I have shared openly and will answer questions however I am not going to draft and post a build sheet; this has been a work in progress with her now having a Bryant crank, JE 10.1 flat top pistons with the tops ceramic coated and the skirts Teflon coated, Total Seal stainless rings, a different and stronger set of Manley rods, custom cams, custom cam chains as stated along with custom tensioners and “yes” the primary chain is OEM as there are no custom chains available and this one and yet it has not proven to be an issue. There was much massaging throughout as this project has progressed over time and yet I need to make clear again; hardware and internal massaging alone will not create these results. Having shared this I remain certain that this is not the end of the road for Ed and his gal but rather one more stop along the way as it has been a long journey and we expect it to continue.

Once can compile the create array of hardware and in the end have little more than a wonderful array of hardware, one can massage and massage only to find that which is being done to be counterproductive, and then there is the tuning; “NOT” on the dyno playing the let’s get a number game but rather that which it take to create a machine that is usable in the real world and not simply WOT.

When drag racing on an extreme level at the tree would be two gals often with hearts nearly the same based on the hardware build sheets and yet one was a rocket and one a bomb. It is more often the incremental differences that would set one successfully apart from the bomb and furthermore experience and the willingness to step out of the proverbial box which means taking risks is a key component.

If it was easy and inexpensive everyone would consider it however it is not but then you know this as well too.

Other forum members such as Fubar, Mullet, Soroush, Torrie, have all stepped out of the proverbial box with at time great success and at other times something less and yet through it all there has always been a supportive audience that was able to vicariously participate in their project and in many cases learn something however for whatever reason this thread took on a different tone. I suspect that the only reason that Ed is having a hard time with this thread is because it is associated with the “Shadowman”

The thread was a simple sharing of Ed’s present dyno sheet and it was never intended on being a classroom and yet “all” of you know that I am only a phone call away.

Thank you all for the time spent reading the thread and your participation within it.

Takes care

Shadowman

That's a lot to digest.
 

FENZO

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Jul 7, 2008
1,518
Lafayette, CO
Congrats Ed, I'm happy for you & thanks for posting.

I would need to tow a trailer with a couple extra sets of rears... I can't get the power down with 600hp... 850 immediate hp on pump gas?!? Crazy impressive.
 
Aug 25, 2006
4,436
B.M.F. and Apollo - thanks for your comments. You know that I'm not really trying to create sides - despite that everyone is quick to go on the attack.

As I said before. I wanna believe. Tell me more. It goes against my "small minded" expectations on what is possible.... Didn't I say I'm ready to eat crow? Perhaps a small price for the knowledge I can gain!

IMO if you wanted to believe then you would have simply said "awesome" followed by how can I get there too but instead you have questioned everything making it clear that you do not understand as such that which you do not understand became suspect; sad.

I have been here for you on many occassions including during your very first Ford GT Whipple installation so it seems to me that your time in the proverbial saddle has been short whereas I have been massaging forced induction gals for nearly 40 years.

Time in this case IMO = education

All the best

Shadowman
 

B.M.F.

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Jan 29, 2009
1,814
Minnesota
One step further......I'd rather line up 2 cars on the freeway, honk 3 times and whoever lifts first loses. Also a mile pull on a runway and let the end speed do the talking. :)

Agreed.....
 

B.M.F.

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Jan 29, 2009
1,814
Minnesota
? though for Shadowman. Why does it not have at least 52lb gt500 injectors and a boost a pump in it for safety? Sounds like he spent a fortune else where on the build and the fuel system being a important key keeps the motor from exiting its self out the oil pan. Just curious as the fuel system is one of the 1st things ive always looked at when doing a build. Not taking it past its limits and then worrying about it. Just curious as a person with years of experience this should come natural to you? Did the customer not want the fuel system done?
 
Last edited:

nota4re

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Feb 15, 2006
4,294
I have been here for you on many occassions including during your very first Ford GT Whipple installation so it seems to me that your time in the proverbial saddle has been short whereas I have been massaging forced induction gals for nearly 40 years.

Oh, I'm gonna puke ye 'ol Grandmaster! We didn't start on the GT until 2006 - but have a long history of forced induction and engine management, thank you very much. Oh yes, and if it wasn't for your supreme wisdom we couldn't find our butt with both hands! I think you have a lot of exaggerations - turning maybe (2) less than 5 minute phone calls into an implication of superiority is a joke. Also we have dealt with cars you have massaged and the claims of results - only which to discover were quite simply mechanically impossible to achieve. So, don't pull the "better than you" crap.

Man, you are so friggen' defensive.... it's gotta make one wonder. And through a lot of words and flowers, now it seems that no one else should go down this path because - according to you - the results are not repeatable! Stranger and stranger, this tangled web you weave.

Finally, post after post after post, you keep saying that I am attacking Ed. I'm not attacking Ed! Give it up.

I got better things to do....
 

nota4re

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Feb 15, 2006
4,294
Thank-you moderators - for letting the thread live. I'll stand behind my posts.
 

Lorenzo

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Dec 28, 2008
626
U.S.A.
user8616_pic277_1214037416.jpg
 

B.M.F.

GT Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Jan 29, 2009
1,814
Minnesota
:club The mods must be on vaca LOL This THREAD DELIVERS..................................................................................
 

BlackICE

GT Owner
Nov 2, 2005
1,416
SF Bay Area in California
? though for Shadowman. Why does it not have at least 52lb gt500 injectors and a boost a pump in it for safety? Sounds like he spent a fortune else where on the build and the fuel system being a important key keeps the motor from exiting its self out the oil pan. Just curious as the fuel system is one of the 1st things ive always looked at when doing a build. Not taking it past its limits and then worrying about it. Just curious.

I looked at the GT500 injectors and they have a dual spray pattern for the GT500 whereas the Ford GT injectors are single cone pattern. Is they any problems with running these dual patterns injectors on a FGT?
 
Aug 25, 2006
4,436
? though for Shadowman. Why does it not have at least 52lb gt500 injectors and a boost a pump in it for safety? Sounds like he spent a fortune else where on the build and the fuel system being a important key keeps the motor from exiting its self out the oil pan. Just curious as the fuel system is one of the 1st things ive always looked at when doing a build. Not taking it past its limits and then worrying about it. Just curious as a person with years of experience this should come natural to you? Did the customer not want the fuel system done?

Initially the customer did not want a Boost-A-Pump and frankly I would like a better option and yet this will likely be our next course of action.

At the present time based on her usage no limits have not been exceeded; I remain "very" aware of the often barely seen fine line.

Thank you again for your contributions to this thread.

Shadowman
 
Last edited:
Aug 25, 2006
4,436
Oh, I'm gonna puke ye 'ol Grandmaster! We didn't start on the GT until 2006 - but have a long history of forced induction and engine management, thank you very much. Oh yes, and if it wasn't for your supreme wisdom we couldn't find our butt with both hands! I think you have a lot of exaggerations - turning maybe (2) less than 5 minute phone calls into an implication of superiority is a joke. Also we have dealt with cars you have massaged and the claims of results - only which to discover were quite simply mechanically impossible to achieve. So, don't pull the "better than you" crap.

Man, you are so friggen' defensive.... it's gotta make one wonder. And through a lot of words and flowers, now it seems that no one else should go down this path because - according to you - the results are not repeatable! Stranger and stranger, this tangled web you weave.

Finally, post after post after post, you keep saying that I am attacking Ed. I'm not attacking Ed! Give it up.

I got better things to do....

No “Grand Master” here but rather I was sharing a factual moment in time and in doing so making clear that as with everyone that calls I have “always” been here for you too.

I do wish for you nothing but the best and wish that you could find the means to ask questions about that you do not know rather than infer that which you have been told is less than true.

Takes care

Shadowman
 
Status
Not open for further replies.