To this point, it pretty much has been...for the money anyway!
When cheap is job #1
I won't even mention how much architecture is lifted from the 351 Cleveland
To this point, it pretty much has been...for the money anyway!
To this point, it pretty much has been...for the money anyway!
“When cheap is job #1
I won't even mention how much architecture is lifted from the 351 Cleveland.”
Preach Brother! Let it rip!
Not to steal the thread, but I always thought Ford kind of gave up on the Cleveland, outside of the Pantera. I know the timing of the engine’s introduction was poor, basically the end of the performance era, but Chevy really promoted tons of parts and add ons in the dead 70s. Windsor parts were rare in comparison and Cleveland components were non exisitent, unless one really paid up for it.
Not to steal the thread, but I always thought Ford kind of gave up on the Cleveland, outside of the Pantera. I know the timing of the engine’s introduction was poor, basically the end of the performance era, but Chevy really promoted tons of parts and add ons in the dead 70s. Windsor parts were rare in comparison and Cleveland components were non existent, unless one really paid up for it.
DOHC with Heads reversed so exhaust exits into the valley where 2 turbos reside.
'Not sure locating TTs there makes any more sense than locating the starter there (as was the case with the Northstar). One would think it'd make even less sense from the standpoint of heat dissipation...although that's undoubtedly an issue G.M. must have addressed.
'Great from the standpoint of space saving regardless.
The Hot V layout has been the standard setup for AMG/BMW/Audi for several years now. Great for cold start emissions, nearly zero turbo lag, and for those that like to tinker, turbo swaps are super easy now. Drive an AMG car with their 4.0 TT setup, and you can't help buy be impressed. Sounds and feels like a highly tuned 427.