Never owned a vett - been a Ford blue guy since I was 20. With that said, I would get the GT500 and not just because I had to wait 8 months to get mine!!! Stepping into a vett would be easy - good luck trying to order a Shelby GT500.
The GT500 is a coupe.
No, the TT is not a 4 seater anymore, my kids are 13 and 14.
The Z is 30k more, like the power, but not the looks that much.
Someone suggested to get the GT500 and mod it ???
What's Ford planning to keep up w/competition ? Anyone knows?
There's a pretty good market for hi performance cars out there...
Re: the ZO6 ... this is a weee bit off the subject here, but, just out of curiousity, am I the only guy in the country who thinks the C6 ZO6 (and all C6's for that matter) is just SCREAMING for a "split" rear window ala 1963??????:shrug
Yes, I'm a "mustang guy".........So, excuse me for pointing out the fact that the shelby is a heavy car that is no match for a Z51 let alone a Z06, that's all..........As a ford enthusiast, it's a shame that the best ford can do is kill SVT and supply an expensive 4,000lb car with a live axle that can't approach the PERFORMANCE of GM's efforts. If ford sold cars that were inspiring, they wouldn't be a broke future subsidiary of Nissan. Only a few of us are lucky enough to be able afford an FGT. Fortunately for ford, most buyers aren't worried about the road course or world class performance and the mustang sells well.
don't tell me that pilots don't appreciate a Sukhoi. It is a winner after all and isn't winning what gave the GT it's heritage? I agree, you have to love them, but how many world aerobatic championships have been won in a Pitts lately? :wink
bruce
frankly, who cares if a Z06, Viper, FGT, Shelby, Kia is quicker... they all are great cars. 99.999% of us will never drive our cars to the absolute limit.
Kia's are great cars!:biggrin
WHAT A COOL IDEA!
I know! I get one every now & then!:rofl
But seriously, don't you think the back end looks of the C6's would benefit "big time" from a "split rear window"? That might even offset the "downer" experienced by viewing the FRONT end... maybe...
'Don't see it ever being allowed by the "bean counters" though.:thumbsdow
Hey...I want one of them split window Z06 coupes!!! Sign me up.
FYI...I know someone who has weighed their Shelby with the stereo that has the heavier sub and a 3/4 full tank and it weighed 3850 on the scales. Ask anyone who owns one, it drives like a car that weighs much less....
Bruce,
The biggest difference between the FordGTForum and just about every other forum on the web is civility. Most of us own multiple cars and everybody has their own reasons for choosing what they do. As far as road course cars are concerned, every car is a pig compared to something else unless your driving a top level F1 single seater. Every car is a stone slug at the strip compared to something else unless you're busting 5 seconds in a top fuel car. Though I doubt the forum members don't already know it, your pointing out that the Corvette is lighter, faster, and handles better than the GT500 or, for that matter, the Bentley Continental GT's that several of our members own is a welcome analysis. These other cars are purchased because they perform in other ways for their owners that the Corvette can't match. There is a reason the Mustang outsells the Corvette over 10 to 1. General Motors is every big a financial train wreck as Ford, the GT500 weighs 3800 lbs, and it outperformes every 4 seat car General Motors builds in America. If you want to post up in the GT500/Shelby section of this Ford enthusiast forum with comments you've made like, "nose heavy 4000 lb. pig and fat ass Shelby" your not pointing out anything, your insulting. My "like kind" response to your post and your reaction to it shows you don't like the same type of insults you have issued applied to your choices. Your analysis is welcome, but please confine your insults to the Corvette Forums where such comments are the norm.
Chip
I'm all for civility too but there's nothing wrong with pointing out that Ford has trended towards a 4,000lb pony car where BMW and GM have trended towards better performance thru the use of advanced tech and light weight materials.
Look, let's agree to disagree on minor details because this is a bit out of hand. Apparently I'm in trouble for insulting you and, recognizing that perception is reality, I will now formally apologize to you, Chip. Never meant anything personal by it.
You said I was "wrong" to call myself a mustang guy. Frankly, I considered that an insult. Just for clarification, I am somewhat dissapointed in a few aspects of the new car, that's all. Just another perspective for the fine readers at home out there. It's all a matter of perspective and opinion. Mine simply comes from the perspective of a track enthusiast and I should have made that part clear. Had I communicated more clearly, we wouldn't have had such a fun exchange :biggrin
I'm all for civility too but there's nothing wrong with pointing out that Ford has trended towards a 4,000lb pony car where BMW and GM have trended towards better performance thru the use of advanced tech and light weight materials. "Fat ass" was only my crude way of being concise and not a personal insult. Of course I would love to have one in the collection. I'd like all kinds of "nose heavy pigs" including the lovely Bentley so mentioned.
edit: now that you guys have me thinking, if I added a back seat and all the rest of the luxury to the R it would weigh the same as the Shelby. Still wish it had an IRS though . . .
cheers,
Bruce
Re: the ZO6 ... this is a weee bit off the subject here, but, just out of curiousity, am I the only guy in the country who thinks the C6 ZO6 (and all C6's for that matter) is just SCREAMING for a "split" rear window ala 1963??????:shrug
Saw this beauty at our local Ford PAG show in Irvine last weekend...