viva gt
GT Owner
I think it was a question of 3.4 vs 4.0!
I have a a june 2012 3.4l and hope to have no issues til 100,000 miles. At that point, I will be dust, myself.
So...........
I think it was a question of 3.4 vs 4.0!
I have a a june 2012 3.4l and hope to have no issues til 100,000 miles. At that point, I will be dust, myself.
?????? Am I
Yes, I did.
Thanks!
Turbo's are not "free HP". Back pressure takes energy too. At 20psi, there is only a slight difference.
Thanks and will do after family, this weekend.Get me the serial number from the top of the compressor/bearing plate.
does anybody know if any of the TT kits for GT's on the market are Header compatible out of the box or do they have to be modified???
Hey Freddy! This turns into a packaging challenge. From a peak psi/HP perspective, there is likely a multitude of custom options that you can choose from to place the turbos in different places. However, our experience is that the ultimate performance/driveability of the TT's is when you can get the boost from the TT as LOW in the rpm range as possible. In order to do this, two of the largest factors are the size and the location of the turbos. Simply stated, the closer that you can get the turbos to the exhaust ports, the faster that you can get them to spool. Within our GT's - the closest practical placement is in the space occupied by the large OEM cat converters. Now, if you consider that the turbos are placed here you have a relatively short space (and the challenge of sneaking under the half-shafts) to fit manifolds or headers. Long story short, when we worked with Heffner in developing the "V2" of his TT kit, we eliminated his (beautiful) headers in favor of the stock manifolds and a very "proprietary" sized tubing from the manifold outlets to the turbos. The results were amazing and in the unanimous opinion of those that upgraded to the V2 - they were "stunned" at the difference in driveability.
In summary, you can keep your headers and get a custom-developed TT system. You can get even bigger turbos if you are not confined to the cat converter location and you can have HP where the sky is the limit. As a race machine, this may a better choice.... it all depends on what you want to do with the car.
Regarding that last sentence, my friend, you are VERY sadly mistaken. It's not a theoretical debate. I have a multitude of dyno charts of YOUR superchargers on Ford GTs and similarly, a couple of dozen dyno charts on TT GTs. The TT - at the same boost pressures are making MORE THAN 100HP over the Whipples. FACT.
Obviously you are very proud of your products, and you have every right to be. There are advantages of a SC over the TT route. Cost per HP added, for example, is decidedly in the SC favor. As far as the workload on the engine, HP/psi of boost, and less-than-OEM crank keyway torque, the TT's are king. Many, many other pros and cons - but please don't hang your hat on HP/psi of boost unless you have the facts to back it up.
Regarding that last sentence, my friend, you are VERY sadly mistaken. It's not a theoretical debate. I have a multitude of dyno charts of YOUR superchargers on Ford GTs and similarly, a couple of dozen dyno charts on TT GTs. The TT - at the same boost pressures are making MORE THAN 100HP over the Whipples. FACT.
Obviously you are very proud of your products, and you have every right to be. There are advantages of a SC over the TT route. Cost per HP added, for example, is decidedly in the SC favor. As far as the workload on the engine, HP/psi of boost, and less-than-OEM crank keyway torque, the TT's are king. Many, many other pros and cons - but please don't hang your hat on HP/psi of boost unless you have the facts to back it up.
Jaxgt has come and gone. Problem fixed. No metal shavings in the intercooler. All is well and Jaxgt will be at the rally with his car! Took a while to diagnose as after we changed the blower, we had an entirely new issue, but found it and car is running like a champ! See you guys next week at the rally!