Good question. I say "lack of available inventory" is one. Easier to find a 4K mile GT than a 40K mile GT. Second is selling what the public wants. The GT buying public is hugely mistaken when they want/demand low-mile cars. If you found a 2005 Mustang GT or something similar with 30K miles you would think you found gold. The GT buying public just won't accept the fact that a GT with miles is every bit as good, if not better, (because it was driven & not stored) than a super low mile car. Don't rely entirely on Carfax either. It can go either way. A "hammered" car can have a clean Carfax easily and an "accident free car" can have a bad Carfax. I have told this before.....I had an 06 Jaguar sedan that was black (hard color to hide paintwork). The car had never been painted on. No tape lines, no dust in the paint, no sanding marks....nothing. I had dealer friends and bodyshop owners look at the car....all agreed...no paintwork, no undercarriage damage. It said "accident" on Carfax. What happened....did a bird hit the windshield.?...did they run over an animal? .... or just a flat out mistake? I guess define "accident". It did not elaborate. You have to use a bit of common sense....not rely ona piece of paper. It hurt the value nevertheless. Sad really.
I think over time condition will outweigh miles. There is a 67 Olds 442 in this months Hemming. Super low miles (3911)....but a repaint and modified slightly. My personal opinion is one with 70K miles but nice original is worth more. Think about old Shelby Mustangs and Cobras. Documentation, originality, history, condition far outweigh miles.
I think over time condition will outweigh miles. There is a 67 Olds 442 in this months Hemming. Super low miles (3911)....but a repaint and modified slightly. My personal opinion is one with 70K miles but nice original is worth more. Think about old Shelby Mustangs and Cobras. Documentation, originality, history, condition far outweigh miles.
Last edited: