Sorry if this has been posted before, but I just saw it:
http://driving.ca/bmw/m5/auto-news/news/five-of-the-most-underrated-engines-and-their-true-power
Don’t think that underrating engines is something unique to the 1960s. The practice of saying your engine is less powerful than it actually is can still be used to full insurance companies. Ford rated the 5.4-litre supercharged V8 in the GT at 550 horsepower at the crank. This dyno test of a stock GT produced 562 horsepower at the wheels. This is a staggering number and other GT owners have reported stock cars producing 520 to 550 horsepower to the wheels. If we factor in a conservative 15% drivetrain loss, that means these engines are actually making around 630 horsepower!
http://driving.ca/bmw/m5/auto-news/news/five-of-the-most-underrated-engines-and-their-true-power
Don’t think that underrating engines is something unique to the 1960s. The practice of saying your engine is less powerful than it actually is can still be used to full insurance companies. Ford rated the 5.4-litre supercharged V8 in the GT at 550 horsepower at the crank. This dyno test of a stock GT produced 562 horsepower at the wheels. This is a staggering number and other GT owners have reported stock cars producing 520 to 550 horsepower to the wheels. If we factor in a conservative 15% drivetrain loss, that means these engines are actually making around 630 horsepower!