Great, thanks. I do have Bridgestones now. Much softer, quieter ride. Still haven't been out in 50F or above so haven't tried grip yet.
GT, Scott hit it on the nose...…...
Ive driven around the world almost in the rain , not over 150 mph but fast , the bridgestones are perfect for THAT car.
GTJOEY1314
Indy, No Race till August my friend...…...Was adding my two cents of laymen driving not track at 200 mph all day.
That's all, Buy the book ,it goes to the Veterans in the end and relive all our glory days.....
You guys under lock and key or just restricted?
gtjoey1314
Well yes and no...it was purely styling and matching the GT40 MkI and MkII appearance / proportions of the body and the wheels in sizes and sidewall heights. So the result is yes it works well for the lower front hood and big rear "hips" as Camilo likes to say. So fender clearance for turning was a by product. Not an intent. (Another topic I could talk at length on and my first all nighter on the program working on tire clearance envelopes...I think I may have talked about this on the forum somewhere)I'm not a racer so wondering about the large front to rear tire difference. I don't recall seeing such a difference on a car before. Is it to keep hood profile lower, and inner fender clearance for turning radius?
Not often you get an answer like that, usually just well educated input. Thanks for building this car and being active on the forum.Well yes and no...it was purely styling and matching the GT40 MkI and MkII appearance / proportions of the body and the wheels in sizes and sidewall heights. So the result is yes it works well for the lower front hood and big rear "hips" as Camilo likes to say. So fender clearance for turning was a by product. Not an intent. (Another topic I could talk at length on and my first all nighter on the program working on tire clearance envelopes...I think I may have talked about this on the forum somewhere)
But Camilo's show car tire sizes were were very close to final at the front (245/45's vs 235/45's), but he used only 285/40R19's at the rear. And I did quick math and went to the 315/40R19's at the back. So a pretty big difference. Regardless, those big side walls for the retro look are great for ride and impact harshness, but very tough for steering response and directness / predictability and handling behaviors. Our chassis team, especially the development guys like Mark McGowan and Jeff Walsh, worked very hard with Goodyear to make those tires behave near our targets. And meet extremely difficult high speed durability requirements (205 mph) - the reason for two pressures on the FGT. We went through the alphabet nearly twice on constructions and compounds of tires in finding the best combination. We did not change tire sizing, tread pattern or any dimensions (the tire molds were fixed from the beginning except one rear tire shoulder shape change for clamshell clearance that did not match GY's original CAD we used) at all throughout.
Hopefully this helps.
Absolutely GT@50. Glad to participate as well. Thank you for the continued support Specracer and Howard. And this community in general.Not often you get an answer like that, usually just well educated input. Thanks for building this car and being active on the forum.