Ten Questions with: Part 2


Triheart7

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Apr 3, 2007
2,579
Northern California
I was wondering what Jamal is up to presently. Still with Ford? Sorry, I do not know this.

PS. Nice avatar Dave!!!!
 

soroush

Ford Gt Owner
Mark II Lifetime
Aug 8, 2007
5,256
mine is in two part, what were the names of the two girls I saw your picture with in DBK's computer, and may I get an invite to the next event.:wink
 

ChipBeck

GT Owner
Staff member
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Feb 13, 2006
5,783
Scottsdale, Arizona
A question with a practical application for many of us.

Jamal,

As the Ford GT is delivered from the factory, it looks a little nose high with too much space between the top of the front tire and the top of the front wheel well. Many of us have lowered the front of our cars 1/2" or so for aesthetic reasons. I read somewhere however, that although lowering the front end slightly does increase downforce at speed, it also increases drag.

I have a photo of my car at the finish line of the Texas mile and at 175 mph the front end appears to have been pushed even lower by aerodynamic forces.

So here's my question.

Does the Ford GT have the least amount of aerodynamic drag in it's stock configuration with the belly pan absolutely parallel to the ground? With the belly pan level would drag increase or decrease as the car is lowered? By lowering just the front end 1/2 inch, so the belly pan is no longer parallel to the ground, are we increasing drag and hurting our one-mile times?

Thanks Jamal!

Chip
 

Attachments

  • Jamal Mile.jpg
    Jamal Mile.jpg
    146 KB · Views: 243
Last edited:

PL510*Jeff

Well-known member
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Nov 3, 2005
4,901
Renton, Washington
Jamal,

As the Ford GT is delivered from the factory, it looks a little nose high with too much space between the top of the front tire and the top of the front wheel well. Many of us have lowered the front of our cars 1/2" or so for aesthetic reasons. I read somewhere however, that although lowering the front end slightly does increase downforce at speed, it also increases drag.

I have a photo of my car at the finish line of the Texas mile and at 175 mph the front end appears to have been pushed even lower by aerodynamic forces.

So here's my question.

Does the Ford GT have the least amount of aerodynamic drag in it's stock configuration with the belly pan absolutely parallel to the ground? With the belly pan level would drag increase or decrease as the car is lowered? By lowering just the front end 1/2 inch, so the belly pan is no longer parallel to the ground, are we increasing drag and hurting our one-mile times?

Thanks Jamal!

Chip

Chip - glad you asked this of Jamal.

Indy GT would use up the bandwidth of Google,Inc with his response.:lol
 

fjpikul

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Jan 4, 2006
11,704
Belleville, IL
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Good one Jeff.
 

Indy GT

Yea, I got one...too
Mark IV Lifetime
Jan 14, 2006
2,545
Greenwood, IN
Ok Jeff and FRANK...

All I am going to say is Chip asks a very important and intelligent question.
I am interested in Jamal's response as well...

Chip's question also dovetails with the use of the extended front splitter. Wonder what his car profile would look like at the end of the mile utilizing this aero modification?
 

RALPHIE

GT Owner
Mar 1, 2007
7,278
...Chip's question also dovetails with the use of the extended front splitter. Wonder what his car profile would look like at the end of the mile utilizing this aero modification?

and, while the extended splitter might correct the profile, would there be increased drag which would reduce his maximum speed?
 

Indy GT

Yea, I got one...too
Mark IV Lifetime
Jan 14, 2006
2,545
Greenwood, IN
Exactly Ralph!
 

Kayvan

GT Owner
Jul 13, 2006
4,782
Were there particular times in development when Carroll Shelby was brought in to provide feedback / 'bless' certain stages of the project.

I have seen video of him in a early test/mule, and others shots as well.
 

FM99

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Mar 4, 2008
132
Iowa
When Ford considered/approved the project, what was the greatest concern from the legal department with the proposed development of a 200+ mph super car? How were these concerns addressed in the production of the car?
 

fjpikul

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Jan 4, 2006
11,704
Belleville, IL
Knowing where you grew up, what made you decide to do this and what schools did you attend to get there and build your career?

Next question, which one of you smarta**es thought up the front fender liners?
 
Last edited:

AZGT

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Dec 20, 2005
1,354
Scottsdale, AZ.
Was the "100" in the headlights intentional (and for the centennial) or was it something that someone noticed afterward.
 
Aug 25, 2006
4,436
Did Ricardo take a need as presented for the Team at Ford and then present to the Team the transaxle and clutch package or was Ricardo given design specifications and then simply asked to create it?

Thank you for your time

Takes care

Shadowman
 

pe2unia

GT
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
What is the REAL story about trying to use the GT-40 name?. What other names were considered?


Why not GT-44:thumbsup
I am getting tired of getting mustang parts:lol
 

nota4re

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Feb 15, 2006
4,291
I had a lengthy discussion with presumably the "right" people at Autometer regarding the GT gauges. The jist of it was that I was trying to convince Autometer to PLEASE consider a repair program for GT owners. Allegedly (and quite easy to understand), Autometer, by their contract with Ford, cannot accept these "Ford" parts for repair. This is probably boiler-plate type of contract terminology with the intent of preventing Ford-chosen suppliers from competing with Ford.

However, in consideration of the inordinate amount of gauge failures combined with the inordinately high replacement cost, I am wondering if there's some kind of middle ground where either the consumer (GT Owner), an intermediary (like Shadowman, myself, etc) or even a Ford dealership can have an option to send gauges in for repair?
 

BlackICE

GT Owner
Nov 2, 2005
1,416
SF Bay Area in California
I would think if a middleman disassembled the gauges to internals only (so that it is not a recognizable Ford gauge), the internals can be sent to Autometer to repair or replace.
 

GT38

GT Owner
Mark IV Lifetime
Jan 19, 2008
720
Glendale, Arizona
Why not GT-44:thumbsup
I am getting tired of getting mustang parts:lol

It's actually not a Ford GT. It's a "Ford GT not the Mustang, the Supercar". And even that doesn't always work. :ack
 

Kayvan

GT Owner
Jul 13, 2006
4,782
re: Gauges

The conversation to have is with a automotive gauge restoration facility. I know in vintage german cars a number are famous for doing Gullwing/300 SL.

Some are: Palo Alto Speedometer Repair, Lauderdale Speedometer, North Hollywood Automotive Guages (FL), etc.

These folks are like watchmakers in dis-assembling instruments and even do laser cut silk screen gauge faces from original patterns; in addition, to conversion to electronic/quartz for clocks.

Not sure if there is similar for Italian (Veglia) or Shelby/Smiths that people know.
 
Last edited:

Fubar

Totally ****** Up
Mark II Lifetime
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Aug 2, 2006
3,979
Dallas, TX
If the interview is still pending... Why did they go with dual blade throttle body, rather than a large single blade?
 

dbk

Admin
Staff member
Le Mans 2010 Supporter
Jul 30, 2005
15,247
Metro Detroit
It is. Jamal came over the other day but because he still works for Ford Motor Company, he has to clear all the answers with public affairs. I'll throw it in.