I was wondering what Jamal is up to presently. Still with Ford? Sorry, I do not know this.
PS. Nice avatar Dave!!!!
PS. Nice avatar Dave!!!!
Jamal,
As the Ford GT is delivered from the factory, it looks a little nose high with too much space between the top of the front tire and the top of the front wheel well. Many of us have lowered the front of our cars 1/2" or so for aesthetic reasons. I read somewhere however, that although lowering the front end slightly does increase downforce at speed, it also increases drag.
I have a photo of my car at the finish line of the Texas mile and at 175 mph the front end appears to have been pushed even lower by aerodynamic forces.
So here's my question.
Does the Ford GT have the least amount of aerodynamic drag in it's stock configuration with the belly pan absolutely parallel to the ground? With the belly pan level would drag increase or decrease as the car is lowered? By lowering just the front end 1/2 inch, so the belly pan is no longer parallel to the ground, are we increasing drag and hurting our one-mile times?
Thanks Jamal!
Chip
...Chip's question also dovetails with the use of the extended front splitter. Wonder what his car profile would look like at the end of the mile utilizing this aero modification?
What is the REAL story about trying to use the GT-40 name?. What other names were considered?
Why not GT-44:thumbsup
I am getting tired of getting mustang parts:lol