I read the article and the letter to the editor as a SCM subscriber. I think it was spot on for 99% of it. What Keith and the letter writer missed was, this phenomenon is occurring in other places within the car market. My favorite example is the comparison to the F40. Both flag ship cars to their marque and both produced in high volume. Also important to note that Keith does not offer an opinion on what the value of an FGT would be in the event of favor shifting or market correction.
Lets say a good, relative low mileage Ferrari F40 is $1,250,000. They made 1,315 of them. Using that ratio, if they made 2,630 of them they would be valued around $625,000.00. If they made 5,260 of them they would be valued around $312,500.00. Makes the FGT look like a relative bargin with a median price of $275,000.00 for the same low mileage example.
Is the F40, Countach, 959, F50, Enzo and FGT market overheated? Probably yes. But like others have stated here, it will take a major global market correction to turn this around. Even a 25% market correction (which is a huge correction) would bring FGT prices into the $210-$220 range (for relative low mile cars).
On the other hand, in the coming global market (and subsequent car market) correction, not all generations of cars are treated equal. Cars from the 40s-70s will be hit hardest because the demographic that would rescue it are not buying any more cars. The best of the best will always recover to a new high but a lot of production cars from that era will never recover. I would much rather be sitting on something from the 80s-00s as that demographic (people born in the 60s, 70s and 80s) are hitting their peak earning years and can afford to ride a downturn.
Want that Lusso or 275 GTB, just wait about 10 years when prices are in half. Want a FGT, better buy it sooner than later. Like the stock market, you can't time it so better to by a late model, timeless example like the FGT. You could go wrong in worst ways.