When they show the trailer from the front it looks pretty close to the road, maybe 5 feet or less. Who knows how far the Viper knocked it back. It's just never a good idea to have large stationary objects that aren't permanent on the road. When people aren't expecting something, if they are distracted (which they frequently are) they might hit it. Witness all the cop cars that get blasted yearly while making traffic stops...
Cops are pretty much ALWAYS closer to traffic than this trailer appears to be though, Dave ...they can barely get off the road at all many times. Besides, in this particular case, it LOOKS like the Viper was traveling in the "opposite" direction of the trailer (so to speak), on the
opposite side of the road, and crossed over and hit the trailer. Otherwise, the Viper couldn't possibly be resting AHEAD of the trailer's rear axles.
Anyway, in this case, if you view the AIR shot again, it pretty clearly shows the trailer is 8 or 10 feet off the pavement.
The front shot to which you refer ALSO shows a curve in the road
ahead of the trailer which creates the optical illusion from THAT camera angle that the trailer's closer to the road. (Take a look at the air shot again if you wanna spend the time.)
The Viper pbly didn't budge the trailer much if at all judging from the fact the trailer's still parallel to the road.
In any event, it's the responsibility of the driver of a moving vehicle to aviod stationary ones ...especially one's parked off to the side of the road. Something off to the side of the road is just that - something off to the side of the road. The trailer shouldn't have been a pblm at all...especially for someone traveling on the
opposite side of the roadway.
Sooooo, I guess we'll just hafta agree to disagree on this'un, Sir!:lol (Do you think we'll survive it?)
By the way, I don't see any "skid" marks. Are there any? (Maybe under the dirt that's now on the roadway???)