That guy is Tim Schrick, he has quite some racing background. Amongst others, two seasons in the DTC championship. His father is know from the camshafts (in german Nockenwellen) they produce for racing cars. Schrick tuning..Big Carrot said:I've seen that video before. That guy is NUTS! Slinging that thing around on THOSE roads takes balls of brass! He drives it like I drive my car when NOT on a mountain road with walls all around! lol That car definitely does sound amazing!
fjpikul said:Just to let you guys know what happens, impacts like that (especially steering wheel), cause the aorta to tear just after it exits the heart. This can be a little tear which bleeds over a long time, or a big tear that gushes. In either case, the pericardium (the sac surrounding the heart and separating it from the other organs in the chest) fills with blood and then the heart can't pump cause no room is left. It's called tamponade.
Stefan, vid made my day, my favorite track, bar none... :thumbsupSLF360 said:Some more of Tim,
on the Nuerburgring, in deep winter... Inspiration for DBK to go and try snowy Detroit, these days !
http://hoheacht.free.fr/vids/nordschleife_winter.mpg
Red Rocket said:Oh, yes I think most of us know about that case. The owner/driver of the car was apparently a great guy who did a lot of charity work. The passenger was actually a very successful web entrepreneur from near where I live (Vancouver) and he was also an experienced rally driver.
I understand the event was an open track day and there was no one signalling drivers coming out of the pits whether the coast was clear. The Carrera driver was doing 160 mph - they say - and to avoid the Ferrari coming blindly out of the pit lane he ended up skidding sideways across the infield to the inner wall. Similar in some ways to the impact another Vancouver-based driver (Greg Moore) suffered which was also fatal, at the same track in 1999.
I have it on good authority that what killed the CGT occupants was internal injuries based on the impact. Tragic. But this points out something else that drivers of fast cars need to know. Air bags and seat belts are sometimes not enough when you're going at those speeds - if the car stops moving abruptly by hitting a solid object (i.e. a tree or concrete pillar) your internal organs keep going and it is internal injuries that often kill occupants of cars at those speeds. Just physics and physiology. So drive safe out there and consider the consequences before you risk yourself, or certainly a passenger.
Derry said:A couple of weeks ago I had the unique opportunity to drive my GT, a CGT, a Ferrari Enzo, a F50, A F40, a Noble M12 and a Viper on the West track at Bondurant in Phoenix for four days. We would 'race' for 20 laps or so and switch vehicles.
It took awhile to get used to the CGT clutch, definitely something you have to concentrate on in order to drive in daily traffic. The car does have the greatest traction control system that I have seen. It does not give the impression of being overly interfering at all. It will allow you to slide the rear out maybe 15 degrees and then softly helps you bring the car back in line. There is no feeling of suuden fuel starvetion or braking from the system at all.
On the third and fourth day we turned off all the traction/stability controls in the cars that had them in order to better appreciate the cars. The Enzo and the CGT literally became different cars! In the case of the Enzo it was much more predictable, though you could still slide it sideways shifting into 4the at 100 mph+ if you did not pay attention. The CGT became a real handful. There is an awful lot of power in that car that comes on VERY suddenly and not in what I felt was a smooth predictable power curve. It would lull into thinking you knew what you were doing and you would push it a little bit more and then surprise, you were oversteering like crazy trying to recover. It felt like a whole new boost of power would hit at 5500 RPM. All that being said it was an awsome vehicle, unlike any other Porsche.
The Enzo and CGT could and did dust the GT pretty effectively. The GT held it's own against any of the others and was a very predictable joy to drive on the track. It took a day and a half to get the tire pressure dialed in though.
Derry
Derry said:A couple of weeks ago I had the unique opportunity to drive my GT, a CGT, a Ferrari Enzo, a F50, A F40, a Noble M12 and a Viper on the West track at Bondurant in Phoenix for four days. We would 'race' for 20 laps or so and switch vehicles.
It took awhile to get used to the CGT clutch, definitely something you have to concentrate on in order to drive in daily traffic. The car does have the greatest traction control system that I have seen. It does not give the impression of being overly interfering at all. It will allow you to slide the rear out maybe 15 degrees and then softly helps you bring the car back in line. There is no feeling of suuden fuel starvetion or braking from the system at all.
On the third and fourth day we turned off all the traction/stability controls in the cars that had them in order to better appreciate the cars. The Enzo and the CGT literally became different cars! In the case of the Enzo it was much more predictable, though you could still slide it sideways shifting into 4the at 100 mph+ if you did not pay attention. The CGT became a real handful. There is an awful lot of power in that car that comes on VERY suddenly and not in what I felt was a smooth predictable power curve. It would lull into thinking you knew what you were doing and you would push it a little bit more and then surprise, you were oversteering like crazy trying to recover. It felt like a whole new boost of power would hit at 5500 RPM. All that being said it was an awsome vehicle, unlike any other Porsche.
The Enzo and CGT could and did dust the GT pretty effectively. The GT held it's own against any of the others and was a very predictable joy to drive on the track. It took a day and a half to get the tire pressure dialed in though.
Derry
Derry said:A couple of weeks ago I had the unique opportunity to drive my GT, a CGT, a Ferrari Enzo, a F50, A F40, a Noble M12 and a Viper on the West track at Bondurant in Phoenix for four days. We would 'race' for 20 laps or so and switch vehicles.
It took awhile to get used to the CGT clutch, definitely something you have to concentrate on in order to drive in daily traffic. The car does have the greatest traction control system that I have seen. It does not give the impression of being overly interfering at all. It will allow you to slide the rear out maybe 15 degrees and then softly helps you bring the car back in line. There is no feeling of suuden fuel starvetion or braking from the system at all.
On the third and fourth day we turned off all the traction/stability controls in the cars that had them in order to better appreciate the cars. The Enzo and the CGT literally became different cars! In the case of the Enzo it was much more predictable, though you could still slide it sideways shifting into 4the at 100 mph+ if you did not pay attention. The CGT became a real handful. There is an awful lot of power in that car that comes on VERY suddenly and not in what I felt was a smooth predictable power curve. It would lull into thinking you knew what you were doing and you would push it a little bit more and then surprise, you were oversteering like crazy trying to recover. It felt like a whole new boost of power would hit at 5500 RPM. All that being said it was an awsome vehicle, unlike any other Porsche.
The Enzo and CGT could and did dust the GT pretty effectively. The GT held it's own against any of the others and was a very predictable joy to drive on the track. It took a day and a half to get the tire pressure dialed in though.
Derry
Derry said:It took awhile to get used to the CGT clutch, definitely something you have to concentrate on in order to drive in daily traffic.
On the third and fourth day we turned off all the traction/stability controls in the cars that had them in order to better appreciate the cars. The Enzo and the CGT literally became different cars! In the case of the Enzo it was much more predictable, though you could still slide it sideways shifting into 4the at 100 mph+ if you did not pay attention. The CGT became a real handful. There is an awful lot of power in that car that comes on VERY suddenly and not in what I felt was a smooth predictable power curve. It would lull into thinking you knew what you were doing and you would push it a little bit more and then surprise, you were oversteering like crazy trying to recover. It felt like a whole new boost of power would hit at 5500 RPM. All that being said it was an awsome vehicle, unlike any other Porsche.
The Enzo and CGT could and did dust the GT pretty effectively. The GT held it's own against any of the others and was a very predictable joy to drive on the track. It took a day and a half to get the tire pressure dialed in though.
Derry
Derry said:A couple of comments to add to those alraedy made. There is no doubt that the short and tight track put the relatively heavy GT at a disadvantage. After alot of trial and error with front/rear tire pressure settings I was impressed with the relative cornering of the GT. I was on the stock tires, though I did put in yellow Padgett brake pads. The tires were shot at the end.
The Noble was the most forgiving, very fun to drive. The GT was in everyones top 2 choice.
Derry