Honestly, the GT-40's with the ZF's shift much nicer than our Ford GT's with the Ricardo, so much for 35 years of development!
Great info, I wish I had the personal experience to confirm the shift feel of an original Mk IV GT40. :cheers
Honestly, the GT-40's with the ZF's shift much nicer than our Ford GT's with the Ricardo, so much for 35 years of development!
I knew that the original GT team has several engineers from Lotus. I can't recall having heard the same thing about the 2005/6
I believe the door cutouts were to allow a quicker entry into the car, specifically for the classic LeMans start. In the early 60's, the drivers lined up on one side of the track across from the cars. When the flag dropped the drivers ran across the track, bailed into the cars, fired up and roared off. Difficult with a "normal" doorframe.
an interesting side note. In 1969 Jackie Ickx, feeling that an unsafe situation had arisen from this start, in protest, walked across the track, sat in GT40 # 1075, buckled his safety restraints and got away last. On the first lap John Woolfe died in a crash in one of the 917's, and another driver survived a career ending crash. Neither had restraints fastened. Ickx won the 24 hours and in 1970 the drivers started in the cars.
an interesting side note. In 1969 Jackie Ickx, feeling that an unsafe situation had arisen from this start, in protest, walked across the track, sat in GT40 # 1075, buckled his safety restraints and got away last. On the first lap John Woolfe died in a crash in one of the 917's, and another driver survived a career ending crash. Neither had restraints fastened. Ickx won the 24 hours and in 1970 the drivers started in the cars.
Great story, do you remember where you read that? I would love to read the full account. :thumbsup
Say it ain't so. No offense to my friends across the pond but I have heard it said that the original GT was more a British car than an American one. This sentiment has been repeated (off the cuff) about the newest rendition of the GT as well. I take great pleasure in politely correcting this rumor. It was my understanding that the only British contribution was the Recardo transmission. Ironically the British transmission was a major failing point on the 60's GT.
The Ford GT we have has many Brit parts, the transmission, brakes, steering - and a few more besides. And that's no bad thing, the Europeans know a thing or two about sports cars.
As long is it doesn't have British electronics!
I suppose that if Ford use Lotus engineers again it wouldn't be surprising (sense Ford owned Lotus then too).
Lotus WAS owned by GM at one time (never Ford), though by the time the Ford GT was being conceived and built, Lotus was/is owned by Proton, a Malaysian company.
The Ricardo transmission in the GT was also used by Audi for their LeMans cars a few years back.
Lotus WAS owned by GM at one time (never Ford), though by the time the Ford GT was being conceived and built, Lotus was/is owned by Proton, a Malaysian company.
The Ricardo transmission in the GT was also used by Audi for their LeMans cars a few years back.
As long is it doesn't have British electronics!
British electronics were truly awful at one stage....
As to Lotus and the chassis, I'm not totally sure what the involvement was or who told me - don't know if they consulted/advised or if it was ex Lotus personnel on the project.
Is it that important? Probably not.
As a note of modest interest, Goodyear was a direct descendent of mine (who died penniless).... so we Brits could even lay moderate claim to the tires too. :biggrin Actually, that would be really stretching things to claim that!