I'm getting alot of folks asking what the Accufab TB and Inlet Support look like, so I'm going to get Jenniffer to put some photos up. Bare with me please.
Attachments
Last edited:
Accufab said:First of all, I think that the OEM TB does have a smaller diameter opening in the rear but that's not relevant anyway. CFM is not just based on the size of the hole. It's based on how much air can go through the hole. All throttle bodies have a resriction in them, namely the shaft and blade. Even in the fully open position, air has to flow around this obstruction so the design (and thickness) of the obstruction is very important, and in the case of the GT, the OEM TB allows for air seperation IN FRONT of the blades. In effect, all the air that would be possible to move through the stock openings is unable to do it. The sharp edges in front of the blades keep part of the inlets free of incoming air. Look closely at the leading edges of the Accufab TB in the photos and then look at the OEM TB and you will see what I'm talking about. We use an airflow bench at our shop to test for CFM on all of our new TB designs and compare these findings against the OEM TB's on the same flow bench.
Ditto. I would like to know this, too. Can you post the number please along with the test conditions? Oh, and what is on the back of the TB when you do the test, or is it just the bare TB? Thanks!lthlvpr said:So what is the difference in CFM flow between stock and the Accufab unit?
Gotcha...straight in! (I mistakenly thought it was similar to mine, which has a plenum between the TB and SC inlet.) Thanks again Jim.Accufab said:Flow numbers with the "plenum"? What plenum, there is no plenum? The TB bolts directly to the supercharger inlet.